What carries what

Z-bars are fastened horizontally to the outside face of the steel studs (24 in. apart in Huntsman’s tested assemblies), and the exterior sheathing is fastened to the Z-bars. Cladding attaches through the sheathing into the Z-bars (brick ties in the detail below). From inside, closed-cell foam fills the 1 to 4 in. space the Z-bars create and the stud cavity in one application, so the studs, the Z-bars and the back of the sheathing end up embedded in one bonded layer.

Huntsman D-Max Wall detail with brick siding: steel studs, Z-bars on their outside face, sheathing over the Z-bars, closed-cell foam behind the sheathing and in the cavity, mineral wool at the slab edge, brick ties
Huntsman D-Max Wall detail, brick siding. Drawing: Huntsman Building Solutions.
The structural design stays with the stud-wall engineer. Huntsman’s detail drawings put it plainly: “The calculation of Z bar connexion to stud wall is the responsibility of the project stud wall structural engineer. He has to consider the project wind load acting on walls and dead load.” The same drawings give the Z-bar gauge by depth, below, and recommend 1.5 to 3 in. of foam over the outer Z-bar flange from inside.
Z-bar depthGauge required (Huntsman detail drawings)
1 to 2 in.20 ga (0.0359 in.)
2 to 3½ in.18 ga (0.0478 in.)
3½ to 5 in.16 ga (0.0598 in.)
Inside view before foam: steel studs, Z-bars and the back of the exterior sheathing
Before the foam: studs, Z-bars, the back of the sheathing
A building corner with Z-bars wrapping the steel studs and plywood bucks at the openings
Z-bars wrapping a corner, bucks at the openings
A long exterior wall with closed-cell foam filling every stud cavity to the sheathing
After: every cavity filled to the sheathing

Photos: Îlot Angus, Montreal, job site.

Racking: what the tests show, and how to treat it

Filling a framed wall with bonded closed-cell foam makes it stiffer. Published tests on framed walls:

TestWallWithout foamWith closed-cell foam
NAHB Research Center, 1996 (as reported by Knowles, Interface, 2010)Steel studs, drywall-clad, vs. R-19 batts2,400 lb5,380 lb (3 in. foam), about +124%
Same testSteel studs, OSB-clad4,800 lb6,000 lb, about +25%
NAHB Research Center (Huntsman Design Note BES-103)2×4 wood studs, 16 in. o.c.—Racking strength up to 200% higher, deflection up to 75% lower
Architectural Testing for SPFA, 2007, ASTM E72Wood studs, polyiso sheathing1,109 lb2,259 lb (1.5 in. foam)

How to treat it: Huntsman’s code report lists the foam as “a nonstructural thermal insulating material”, and the D-Max details leave the Z-bar connections and the stud wall to the project engineer. So the lateral system is designed as if the foam weren’t there. What the tests describe is stiffness and reserve the wall carries anyway: a filled, bonded cavity that deflects less and keeps less permanent deformation. None of the tests above was run on a D-Max assembly itself.

Bond and strength

The foam is sprayed directly against the sheathing, the studs and the Z-bars and cures bonded to them, so there are no gaps for air to move through or for condensation to collect in. Huntsman’s two U.S. D-Max foams:

Property (test)HEATLOK HFO High LiftHEATLOK HFO Pro
Tensile strength (ASTM D1623)101.3 psi44 psi
Compressive strength (ASTM D1621)34.8 psi31 psi
Core density (ASTM D1622)2.0 pcf2.0 pcf
Closed-cell content (ASTM D2856)91%98%
Air permeance at 1 in. (ASTM E2178)< 0.02 L/s·m² at 75 Pa< 0.02 L/s·m² at 75 Pa
Water vapor permeance (ASTM E96)1.56 perm at 1 in.; Class II from 1.875 in.0.91 perm at 1 in. (Class II)
Aged R-value (ASTM C518)R-6.3 at 1 in.; R-26 at 3.5 in.R-7.4 at 1 in.; R-23 at 3.5 in.
Code evaluation reportICC-ES ESR-4073IAPMO UES ER-565

Huntsman technical data sheets, rev. 11.25.24. ASTM D1623 covers tensile and tensile-adhesion properties of rigid cellular plastics; the figures above are the foam’s tensile strength. Huntsman doesn’t publish a separate bond (adhesion) value for either product.

Moisture, vapor and the steel

In a steel-stud wall, condensation usually starts where warm, moist indoor air reaches a cold surface: the back of the sheathing, or a stud flange near the outside. A D-Max wall removes both paths.

  • No air space: the foam is bonded to the back of the sheathing and around every stud, so there is no cavity for indoor air to circulate through. The foam itself is an air-barrier material (< 0.02 L/s·m² at 75 Pa).
  • Warmer steel: the continuous foam layer in the Z-bar space sits outside the stud flanges, so the studs run warmer than in a batt-insulated wall, where the studs are the cold path (ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix A rates R-19 in 6 in. steel studs at an effective R-7.1).
  • Vapor control: at D-Max thicknesses the foam is a Class II vapor retarder (more than 0.1 and no more than 1.0 perm). It controls vapor without being a Class I barrier.
  • Ventilation: a tight building needs designed ventilation, balanced or with heat recovery, the same as any high-performance envelope.

Comfort and longevity

With the steel thermal bridge covered, interior wall surfaces stay closer to room temperature: no cold stripes at the studs and fewer drafts at the slab edges. Sprayed foam is bonded in place, so it can’t slump in the cavity or open gaps the way a batt can, and the wall it builds is the one the building keeps for decades. Huntsman’s tested D-Max assemblies run from R-19.7 to R-29 whole-wall (ASTM C1363).

Fire and code

  • NFPA 285: Huntsman reports the D-Max assembly has passed NFPA 285 as required by IBC 2603.5.5. Ask us for the tested assembly or engineering judgment that matches your cladding.
  • Thermal barrier and fireblocking: interior gypsum is the thermal barrier; the foam meets fireblocking requirements for concealed wall spaces (IBC 718.2).
  • Slab edges: mineral wool in front of slabs and columns, with listed perimeter firestop (engineering judgments from Hilti, 3M and STI).

Documents for your file

Reviewing a wall section?

Send it over and we’ll come back with the matching Huntsman details and documents. Or we’ll walk your team through the system in about 45 minutes.